Monday 17 October 2016

A Parthian shot....



From: 

http://joana-morais.blogspot.com/2008/08/interview-with-gonalo-amaral-iol.html

http://madeleinemccann.org/blog/2014/04/20/goncalo-amaral-the-interviews-augsep-08/


From the very first moment it was political - that remains the most important aspect of this case. 

But where did the alleged power of the couple, which you have been suggesting, come from?

On the first night, a dossier about the family was requested, which the English authorities never sent. It was said that they were connected to commissions that emitted opinion reports on nuclear issues, but none of that was ever confirmed officially. Connections to political parties were also mentioned.

Did the British police send information about the McCanns and their friends?

'No. They never sent the information that we requested. In fact, they did send only once, financial information. They stated that the couple had a mortgage and that there was no knowledge of any credit or debit cards. How didn’t they have any? The registration of the rental car mentions the card numbers. Concerning the other members of the group, the information was also only that.'  unquote

  1. Press and political pressure ensured that the Portuguese police was unable to proceed with normal enquiries, such as requesting background information on the parents and health records of the missing child. 
  2. The McCanns suggested FBI (iirc, FBI psychics) to help in the search. The PJ chose dogs, British dogs. A cadaver dog and a blood dog. The results of those searches led to the McCanns being given arguido status. 
  3. It took eleven months until that status was lifted, after political pressure on the Portuguese government. During this time they had help from top lawyers and certainly from the Home Office. 
  4. Unfortunately this did not result in a 'get out of jail free' card. Portugal is a democracy. They were obliged to publish the greater part of the files. Effect.
  5. The only thing that could be done was to spin the information. Enter 2000 sightings 'hidden' in the files, all allegedly ignored by the PJ. A rich haul for the press, often in the form of a recently deceased paedophile, one to fall back on as and when necessary. Effect. 
  6. Forums and blogs were making the most of the files, politics were fairly useless here, so soft targets were selected by tough lawyers to show  the heretics what could happen to them if they persisted in discussing the possibility of guilt on the parents' part. Effect.
  7. A book to convince the world of the one and only truth.  A book about Madeleine but in most chapters she is strangely absent. Spin.
  8. As the PJ files and the events described in both books gave rise to ever more discussion on the internet it became apparent that something had to be done. However docile the press was, the social media did not fall in line. 
  9. Using political and the tabloid press, team McCann forced a review by Scotland Yard  which would clear their names forever. The PJ files would be seen to be inferior to any Scotland Yard review, or at least they would be presented as such by the press and Scotland Yard.  Effect. 
  10. The next step was to win the case against Dr. Amaral. This attempt failed.  
  11. The next disaster was that the PJ dusted the case off and started again. Cause.
  12. Spin. The McCanns let it be known that they would be helping the PJ as 'assistentes'. This was not confirmed by the Portuguese investigators. 
  13. After years of litigation Dr. Amaral and his associates won the case in the Lisbon Court. 
  14.  Thirteen years after the disappearance of Madeleine, the tabloids are still selling millions of extra copies, spiked with ever more lurid stories as to what may have happened to her. The name and the standard photo of a surprised looking child in a red dress  is the same as printing money as far as  the press are concerned.  Dead or alive, 50.000 + extra copies sold  
  15. Team McCann still stress her being 100% alive and appeal to the public for the much-needed funds needed for the search,   although the accounts of the limited company are particularly unhelpful in determining if  any financial help is needed. 






8 comments:

  1. Yes, it is ALL political now.
    Thank you for your informative posts.
    K9Truth

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sir -- I have been pouring over your findings with great interest. Have you been watching the developments in the "Pizzagate" scandal in the United States? I've noticed no mention of Podesta through the search feature but I figured it could be worth looking into given your stellar work thus far.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Thank you for your compliments! Much appreciated. I'm certainly following present-day politics with great interest but I feel there is plenty of excellent research available on US politics - far better than I could hope to assemble. It's just a matter of finding it and collating the evidence. Here is an excellent assessment of the recent election results.
    En: Harvard Business Review:
    https://hbr.org/2016/11/what-so-many-people-dont-get-about-the-u-s-working-class

    ReplyDelete
  4. "Goodbye and thanks for all the fish.... "

    Fish as in The Miraculous Draught?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Errm, no, fish as in The Hitch hikers guide to the galaxy, when the dolphins left just before the planet was demolished to make way for a galactic super highway,,,

    ReplyDelete
  6. Thanks, Tigger, how interesting...

    I remember your DNA question to Not Textusa and his answer too.

    I'll be looking forward to reading you again if you return, miraculously.

    Peace and respect

    ReplyDelete
  7. Laidbareblog.blogspot.com has a recent post on DNA. Unfortunately nottex doesn't post anymore, my favourite one is the one on the flower doodle on the Tapas booking sheet.

    I'll throw bits and pieces on the Kevin blog as and when I find them. Meanwhile a timeline of the Ben Needham case (which would not have been re-examined without 'the situation OG find themselves in' imo) might help. I don't know, just guessing.

    Yrs T



    ReplyDelete
  8. “Laidbareblog.blogspot.com has a recent post on DNA.”

    Very interesting. Several observations are knew to me. I did not plan to visit that blog any time soon but have just done so thanks to your post and found something of immediate relevance to what I am pondering over at the moment.

    “Unfortunately nottex doesn't post anymore”

    I can’t work out how his blog works. It seems that he posts when he feels like it, and good luck to him. I’m partial to his sarcasm, which I miss, and his logic.

    “Kevin blog”?

    “Meanwhile a timeline of the Ben Needham case (which would not have been re-examined without 'the situation OG find themselves in' imo) might help. I don't know, just guessing.”

    Don’t know enough about the case to comment but enough to agree with your OG remark on the basis of what little I know.

    Bests

    ReplyDelete