REBEKAH AND THE SY REVIEW

It’s a little quiet on the blogs and forums these days, so when I came across these little gems I

thought I’d share them.  The Leveson Inquiry was full on interesting moments and also

embarrassing moments:

Such as the one where Leveson was forced to ask Rebekah Brooks whether, as reported, she threatened her friend Cameron with 'a week of bad headlines' about Theresa May, his Home Secretary, if he didn't agree immediately to a multi-million pound Review into the disappearance of Madeleine McCann, preferably to be announced on the same date, 12th May 2011, as Dr Kate McCann's book, 'madeleine', was published.

The exchange below starts more or less in the middle of the questioning of Rebekah Brooks, the preceding paragraphs explain how the McCanns came to have the book serialised by the Sun, although Ms Brooks could not for the life of her remember if it had set them back by half a million or a million pounds. Never mind, she must have helped with the  ‘Open Letter’ (1) I feel, so neatly phrased as it is.

 

7   Q.  Let's see whether we can agree or disagree on what may

 

             8       have happened.  When you were discussing the

 

             9       arrangements with the McCanns, you asked if there was

 

            10       anything more they wanted.  Do you recall that?

 

            11   A.  Maybe, yes.

 

            12   Q.  And Dr Gerry McCann said that he wanted a UK police

 

            13       review of the case.  Do you remember him saying?

 

            14   A.  That I do, yes.

 

            15   Q.  Do you remember your answer being: "Is that all?"

 

            16   A.  I may have said it slightly more politely: "Is there

 

            17       anything else before we conclude this meeting?", but --

 

            18       I don't particularly remember saying that, but maybe

 

            19       I did, yes.

 

            20   Q.  I'm not suggesting to you that it was impolite; I'm just

 

            21       summarising the gist of what you said.

 

            22   A.  Maybe, yes.  We had been going through a list of issues

 

            23       that Dr McCann and Kate McCann wanted to be assured of

 

            24       before we went forward with the serialisation, so

 

            25       possibly.

 

 

                                           102

 

 

 

 

 

 

            1   Q.  Did you then take the matter up with Downing Street

 

             2       direct?

 

             3   A.  No.

 

             4   Q.  Did you not tell Downing Street that the Sun was going

 

             5       to demand a review and the Prime Minister should agree

 

             6       to the request because the Sun had supported him at the

 

             7       last election?

 

             8   A.  No, in fact I didn't speak to Downing Street or the Home

 

             9       Secretary about this, but I know that Dominic Mohan or

 

            10       Tom Newton Dunn will have spoken to them.

 

            11   Q.  Pardon me?

 

            12   A.  They would have spoken directly to either Number 10 or

 

            13       the Home Office.  I'm not sure.  You'll have to ask

 

            14       them.  Probably the Home Office, I would have thought.

 

            15   Q.  That the Sun wanted an immediate result and that

 

            16       a letter would be posted all over the front page from

 

            17       the McCanns to the Prime Minister asking for a review,

 

            18       unless Downing Street agreed.  Did that happen?

 

            19   A.  I think that's how the Sun launched the campaign from

 

            20       memory.  It was with a letter, yes.

 

            21   Q.  The Home Secretary was told that if she agreed to the

 

            22       review, the page 1 letter would not run.  Do you

 

            23       remember that?

 

            24   A.  No, I don't.

 

            25   Q.  But as the Secretary of State did not respond in time,

 

 

                                           103

 

 

 

 

 

 

             1       you did publish the letter on the front page.  Do you

 

             2       remember that?

 

             3   A.  I do remember the Sun kicking off the campaign with

 

             4       a letter, yes.

 

             5   Q.  But you don't believe there was any conversation or

 

             6       indeed threat to the Secretary of State?  Is that right?

 

             7   A.  I'm pretty sure there would have not been a threat, but

 

             8       you'll have to -- we'll have to ask Dominic Mohan,

 

             9       because, like I said, my involvement was to discuss the

 

            10       campaign in the continued search for Madeleine with the

 

            11       McCanns and to do the deal on the book and to -- they --

 

            12       because I had done so many campaigns in the past, they

 

            13       wanted my opinion, but after that I left it to both

 

            14       editors to execute the campaign.

 

            15   Q.  What I've been told is that you then intervened

 

            16       personally, Mrs Brooks.  You told Number 10 that unless

 

            17       the Prime Minister ordered the review by the

 

            18       Metropolitan Police, the Sun would put the Home

 

            19       Secretary, Theresa May, on the front page every day

 

            20       until the Sun's demands were met.  Is that true or not?

 

            21   A.  No.

 

            22   Q.  Is any part of that true?

 

            23   A.  I didn't speak to Number 10 or the Home Office about the

 

            24       McCanns until, I think, after the campaign had been won,

 

            25       and then it came up in a conversation that I had -- and

 

 

 

(1)

Our Letter to David Cameron, 11 May, 2011

Dear Prime Minister,

As a devoted father and family man, you know the importance of children. Our beloved eldest child, Madeleine, was abducted from Praia da Luz, Portugal, four years ago. Since then, we have devoted all our energies to ensuring her safe return.

Today we are asking you - and the British and Portuguese governments - to help find Madeleine and bring her back to her loving family.

We live in hope that Madeleine will be found alive and returned to us. One call might be all that is needed to lead to Madeleine and her abductor.

To this end, we are seeking a joint INDEPENDENT, TRANSPARENT and COMPREHENSIVE review of ALL information held in relation to Madeleine's disappearance. Thus far, there has been NO formal review of the material held by the police authorities - which is routine practice in most major unsolved crimes.

It is not right that a young vulnerable British citizen has essentially been given up on. This remains an unsolved case of a missing child. Children are our most precious gift.

Please don't give up on Madeleine.

Kate & Gerry McCann

DAILY MAIL ARTICLE 27TH JULY 2007

This is an interesting article as it mentions a number of issues which appear rather earlier than one might have expected. My remarks in red  below.

Daily Mail article 27th July 2007

After three long months without their daughter, what now for the McCanns
By DAVID JONES Last updated at 09:10 28 July 2007

It's three months since Maddy vanished and her parents are grieving in very different ways. He's thinking about moving back to Britain and starting to rebuild their lives. She's still lost in despair and cannot bear to leave Portugal.

This is surprising as only  about six weeks earlier Gerry told a journalist when asked how long they would stay in Portugal that the twins didn’t need to go to school for another 3 years. 
(On the flight to Berlin, Gerry wearily admitted the couple's campaign to find Madeleine could last years.

They refuse to leave Praia da Luz while their precious daughter is still missing.

Asked how long they might stay there, he said: "Well, our kids don't start school for three years."' - Daily Mirror, 07 June 2007)

On Wednesday evening, Gerry McCann flew back to Portugal after a hectic three day trip to Washington DC - the latest and farthest-flung staging post on his mission to champion the cause of abducted children and maximise publicity for his missing daughter, Madeleine.
Settling into his sleeper bed in Virgin Upper Class (mindful of the sniping about the £946,000 fund for Madeleine, of which £67,000 has been spent, he bought an economy ticket, but was given a complimentary upgrade), the 39-year-old heart consultant was exhausted.
In his  blog Gerry wrote that  he was given tickets for the flights so strictly speaking this is an upgrade of a donated  ticket. 

But onlookers remarked that he appeared buoyant for the first time in the three months since his four-year-old daughter was taken.
Ultimately, of course, the McCanns will measure success and failure solely on whether Madeleine is returned safely.
However, according to Justine McGuinness, a Liberal Democrat parliamentary candidate who was recently appointed the Find Madeleine campaign manager, Mr McCann felt the venture had gone "extremely well".
This is despite the fact Mr McCann had encountered some unexpectedly hostile questions, notably from Chris Cuomo, the Good Morning America breakfast show anchor.
"Your story is pretty puzzling - it's tough to understand why you and your wife came to leave your children to go to dinner," Cuomo asserted, remarking that no American parent would "leave their kids in that way".

Unlike Clarence Mitchell, Justine McGuinness was almost invisible, not present in photographs of this trip and very few shots of her afterwards.

And yet, besides highlighting Madeleine's abduction on all four networked TV channels (ABC prefaced its coverage with clips of Britsofthe-moment J. K. Rowling and David Beckham making appeals for information, there were many other pluses.
Mr McCann visited a world-renowned centre for missing children, where he received advice and consoled himself with uplifting stories about abductions which ended fortuitously.
He lobbied senior statesmen on Capitol Hill, including U.S. Attorney General Alberto Gonzalez, who pledged to do all he could. He even met close aides to First Lady Laura Bush.

This is all propaganda. Ernie Allan was in trouble not long afterwards for promoting the search for children who either didn’t exist or weren’t missing. As it happens, I stand to be corrected – the Attorney General was also in trouble not long afterwards.

Gerry McCann met the aide of an aide of Mrs. Bush and was given a very quick tour of the public area of the White House.

"Just about to go into the White House!" he texted his older sister, Philomena, 43.

Later, he told relatives how he received a sloppy, wet 'kiss' from Mrs. Bush's Scottish terrier, Miss Beazley.  . 'She must have known I was a fellow Scot,' he joked.
For those who have followed the relentlessly miserable story of Madeleine's disappearance, Gerry McCann's lightening of mood this week - though probably brief - was heartening.
That said, however, watching him assume his unwanted ambassadorial role   with such purpose and vigour, it was impossible to avoid contrasting his demeanour with that of his wife, Kate, who waited - forlorn, as ever - in the blisteringly hot Algarve. This is very neat, I can’t see how the European Tour and the US visit can be said to be the result of an unwanted ambassadorial role. In fact it is clear from the facts – in my opinion – that it was exactly the role Gerry McCann wanted. But it’s good spin.

For Madeleine's mother, the only white house that matters is the secluded villa in Praia da Luz, which has become the family's refuge since they escaped from Apartment 5A at the Ocean Club resort complex, a place of dark memories now occupied by other British holidaymakers. We’re now going briefly into a tear-fest such as can only be produced by the DailyWail: firstly: the reason Kate returns to the OC every day (except Saturdays when the crèche was closed) is to drop off the twins at the creche, where they went every single day.  I also understand from rogatory interviews and other sources that the dropping off  was frequently done by the relatives who were helping Kate. In the book ''madeleine' Kate even states that on one occasion they 'had to pick up the twins themselves' from the crèche. 

(from Chapter 6 of  'madeleine':  When lunchtime came, Gerry and  I were in the middle of another meeting when we discovered there was no one around to collect Sean and Amelie. We had to interrupt proceedings and go to the Toddler Club ourselves.)

Each morning, Kate returns to the scene of Madeleine's abduction to drop off her two-year-old twins, Shaun and Amelie, at the creche.

On Thursday, after she had settled them in, I happened upon her, walking down to the shore. David Jones is getting quite  Mills and Boone here.
There she sat alone on the rocks, clutching Madeleine's pink Cuddle Cat toy as always, and gazing out at the Atlantic. Later, she stopped briefly to pray at St Vincent's church, where the yellow ribbons tied to the door are fading.
Then she wandered back up the hill to the villa, a wraith among the throngs of cheerful tourists.
If her husband had manufactured a veneer of durability for the U.S. TV cameras, Mrs McCann's emotions were laid bare.
Thinner than ever, she has developed a stoop, as though the emotional burden she carries is strapped across her shoulders.
How was she bearing up, I asked tentatively, shaking her limp hand and wishing her well. She forced a faint smile. "Yeah...well...thanks," were the only words she could summon.
Mr McCann's mother, Eileen, confirms the impression that 86 days after this highly publicised child abduction, Madeleine's parents are reacting in markedly different ways to their loss.
"Kate is really down; not one bit better than she was (when Madeleine was taken).
"I think she's actually going backwards," the 67-year-old widow told me from her home in Glasgow, where she has just returned after a fortnight at the Portuguese villa.

This is interesting, so Eileen McCann was there when Kate made her distressed  phone call to Ricardo Paiva (see Triangle post).
"All she keeps saying is: 'I need Madeleine back'."
"But Gerry is a lot better. He's thinking in terms of missing children. "Madeleine is a missing child and so that's what he's focusing on. Everything he can do now is to help missing children, especially Madeleine."

Here Missing Children in general are top of the agenda, with Madeleine included as  part of that group.
When Mr McCann flew to Washington via London last Sunday night, his wife hugged him so tightly at the airport that it seemed she couldn't bear to let him go.
Reportedly, he phoned constantly from the U.S. to reassure her.
"She's a wee bit lost," said Eileen.
"I know Gerry misses Madeleine terribly and he would be over the moon if he got her back.
"But Kate, very much so. I just think it's a mother's instinct, isn't it? I just feel she needs a wee bit longer."
Eileen revealed that the couple suffered periodic feelings of guilt over the circumstances leading to Madeleine being snatched, but do not blame each other."How many people have stayed in their back gardens  and put their children to bed?" she said. Ah yes, never miss a chance to mention that very large back garden in Rothley, 100 metres to the back door. 
"I think Kate is thinking along the same lines as me: that the person planned it carefully and watched what went on.
"They were just the unfortunate ones - Madeleine was picked out. All the family think that." Yes, well, that doesn’t make it true, but it’s a great story for the Daily Mail readers, they like that sort of thing.   

The McCanns believe the chief suspect, Robert Murat, still has a lot of questions to answer.
According to a Portuguese magazine yesterday, he has changed his alibi for the night Madeleine disappeared.
When first questioned, he is said to have told the police he was with his German girlfriend, but later said he'd spent the night at his mother's house.
While the investigation continues, the McCanns are in limbo.

Gerry, who is on unpaid leave from Glenfield Hospital, Leicester, has spoken about returning to Britain.  I’m not sure that’s true. Compassionate leave was the term used but unpaid leave might boost the 'Fund?'
But his 39-year-old wife, who is on leave from the GP practice where she worked two days a week, refuses even to countenance leaving Praia da Luz.
Whenever the subject is broached, her response is always the same. "I'm not going home without Madeleine."
According to Philomena McCann, neither her brother nor sister-in-law enjoys being in the public eye.
But Kate feels particularly uneasy and will put herself forward only if she believes it is essential to further her cause.

However, as Gerry is accustomed to addressing audiences at medical conferences,  he is far more comfortable in the spotlight. That paragraph gives the impression that Dr. McCann frequently addresses large gatherings. Giving a paper at a conference usually involves publishing said paper somewhere, I have been unable to find such a document.

He has become the public face of the campaign (including receiving calls of support from Gordon Brown) while his wife remains in the background.
"I'm incredibly proud of my brother when I see how he's handling this. But what people see is Gerry being really strong in front of the cameras," said Philomena.
"They don't see the really awful times, and nobody is going to let them see that."

For 12 weeks, Kate has been supported by a rota of visiting relatives.
Her sister-in-law Tricia Cameron, a redoubtable nurse who cooks wholesome meals and raises her spirits, has left her only once for a brief visit to Cambridge to see her son, Paul, graduate in medicine.
Any day now, though, even Mrs Cameron and her teacher husband, Sandy, must say goodbye. But Kate has arranged for replacements to fly in.
Should anyone suggest gently that she could be more easily supported at home in Leicestershire, she explains that she "must be at the scene of the police investigation the very second news breaks".
"I suppose any mother would feel like that," says her mother-in-law.
"But she's got to go home some time. We are hoping that over the next few weeks, Kate will start thinking about it in the longer term. -  again 27^th July –  talking about going home when on the 7th June he is talking about three years. What changed their mind? They were going to learn Portuguese and not leave until Madeleine was found or when the twins needed to go to school.
"But I know for definite that she won't come back at the moment."

So, this could turn out to be a watershed week for the McCanns, with Gerry making strides towards a deliverance of sorts through campaigning work, while Kate retreats further into the depths of her anguish. Ehhh? Deliverance?

Perhaps not entirely coincidentally, this shift comes at the time when, in some quarters at least, the tide of goodwill for the couple is beginning to take a disquieting turn.
From the moment Madeleine went missing, a small section of the public criticised the McCanns for dining in a tapas bar 50 yards from the room where their children slept.
They checked up on them every half-hour rather than make use of the Ocean Club's baby-sitting service. 100 metres walk….
This week, however, what began as reproach became open hostility.
It appears to have been whipped up by a series of dubious 'investigative' articles in the new Portuguese weekly newspaper Sol, which have found their way on to the internet.
Cruelly, and with scant substantiation, the paper portrays the McCann holiday party as more interested in playing tennis, and wining and dining, than looking after their children.
It also accuses the group of maintaining a pact of silence about the events on the evening of May 3, and purports to have uncovered a link between Robert Murat and one of the couples holidaying with the McCanns - they come from Exeter, where Murat had visited his sister a few days before the abduction.
As the Portuguese police investigation has been widely criticised, these salacious articles may have been motivated by misplaced nationalistic revenge. Nice one, listing all the nasty ‘rumours’ and then foisting it on the PJ taking revenge. Nationalistic even! Britain against the world.

But it seems someone at the heart of the inquiry was involved - they contain names and details not previously published.
Whatever the truth, understandably the McCanns are wounded, particularly Kate, whose mistrust of the media has been bitterly confirmed.
They have been stung, too, by other accusations which are so callous that their local paper, the Leicester Mercury, was compelled on Wednesday to block its on-line message facility for the couple. There have been calls for them to be prosecuted for neglect.

Madeleine's case is also said to have been given unwarranted attention because her parents are middle class and have run a slick PR campaign.
Some even suggest they stand to gain from the money donated by the public. 
All of these slurs are as preposterous as they are disgraceful.

This week, however, when I spoke to Philomena, she felt compelled to defend her brother and sister-in-law.
"People talk about Team McCann - they think it's orchestrated. That's nonsense. It's bits and pieces, and pals pulling together," she said.
"There hasn't been any kind of cynical campaign. It's just an amazing coming together. We've winged it and learned as we've gone along."
She cited the Find Madeleine website, with its haunting footage, Gerry's daily blog, an on-line store selling yellow bracelets for a £2 donation and a diary of forthcoming events, all set to the Bryan Adams song (Everything I Do) I Do It For You.
Remarkably professional looking, it was created by 19-year-old Callum McCrae, one of Philomena's former pupils. As it was  listed in the Fund accounts at £ 37.000,-  for that money it should be good, fantastically professional even.

Then there was the Look Into My Eyes poster, inviting people to memorise the distinctive 'flash' in Madeleine's right eye.
 That was devised by Jon Corner, a friend who runs a media company in Liverpool. (devised' = created - constructed...I agree here, devised, constructed. Not actually present in the girl’s eye as her parents stated in an interview in May 2011).

Another friend, Michael Wright, a businessman from Skipton, uses his network of contacts to get funding, and Gerry's brother, pharmaceutical company rep John McCann, helps with strategy.

Madeleine's face is instantly recognisable in dozens of countries, and the reward for information leading to her return stands at £3.2 million.
 "It needs only one greedy, unscrupulous character to come forward," said Philomena McCann. How can one improve on this statement?  On the one hand a 'greedy' person will get the reward, but hey! On the other hand you get Madeleine back. That's got to be worth some money - especially  if it isn't your own?  It was reward money put up by others, not from the Fund  or the McCs themselves.

"So the campaign will go on, whatever anyone says. Those who say we just want to appear on telly should get a life. Can you imagine stopping looking for your daughter?"
Already plans are in place for the next big showpiece event, to mark the 100th day of Madeleine's disappearance on August 11.
Assuming she has not been found by then, 100 Scottish pipers will play a tune penned for her at the world pipeband championship in Glasgow.

Well-intended as such efforts are, of course, one danger is that compassion fatigue will set in. If that half a million was spent to keep Maddie on the front page by Bell Pottinger at that point,  then yes, compassion fatigue had set in. 
Indeed, judging by the turn of events this week, that may already have happened.

Alex Woolfall, a public relations expert who represents Ocean Club's owners, Mark Warner, and maintains contact with the McCanns, says he warned them about this from the beginning, but adds: "Who are we to judge? We haven't been in their position."(see above)

However, according to Ray Wyre, an expert on paedophilia who advised detectives on the Fred and Rose West murder investigation, the decision to keep Madeleine at the top of the news agenda could have serious ramifications. It does look as if it was at this time that  Bell Pottinger was hired by the McCanns, especially since Woolfall also worked for them. This article from the DM seems to cover all the points that one would expect if a PR exercise was in progress.


"There are two potential scenarios," he told me. "If you are Madeleine's parents, it is understandable to want publicity because it might bring information.
"And it means you are not dealing with bereavement; you are dealing with a lost child.
"On the other hand, if Madeleine is in captivity, a high-profile campaign could make her position even worse.
"Her captor may feel it necessary to shut her away for longer periods to avoid her being recognised.
"There's also the possibility that the abductor - or killer - may be watching the McCanns and getting kicks out of what they are doing.
"If you are dealing with a sadist, publicity can become part of the problem. As awful as these possibilities are, they should be assessed carefully."
Since the McCanns are receiving psychological help, these risks must have been taken into account. That would be Alan Pike, who hasn’t exactly got a diploma or NVQ in psychology according to his testimony in the Lisbon Court.


Mr Wyre also expressed a concern that, as in so many cases of family trauma, the strain of losing Madeleine might adversely affect the twins and cause cracks in the McCanns' relationship.
Happily, in this regard at least, Gerry McCann's mother has no fears.
"I know a lot of people split up in situations like theirs, but no way," she said.
"Gerry adores Kate, and she adores him. They were very much in love before, and they still are. I can see in their manner towards each other that it's still there.
"They are saying that all that matters is the twins until they get Madeleine back.
"They spend more time with them than ever. Kate is there at bath-time, lunch-time, dinner-time and bed-time. At the beginning, she wasn't able to do that." ??? The diary and the blog give quite a different account.  

Though the family are careful to avoid saying anything distressing relating to Madeleine, she is discussed as normally as possible in front of Shaun and Amelie.
"Every night, before going to sleep, they always say the same thing: Good night, Shaun. Good night, Amelie - and good night, Madeleine,'" said Eileen.

This touching family ritual is something the hate campaigners would do well to remember as they turn on Gerry and Kate McCann - a devoted father and mother, each struggling to survive through every parent's worst nightmare in their own, very individual way.


UNQUOTE

OVERVIEW OF THE TOUR AND TRIPS HOME

START:

Between the 4th and the 9th of May 2007 the troops available to the McCanns were:

11 members of family and friends

Craigh Mayhew, MW operations director.
The Consul and Pro Consul
The British Ambassador
Alan Pike – trauma psychologist and assistant
Alex Woolfall, PR Head of crisis management
3 Leicester Police Officers
2 Criminal Behaviour Experts from CEOP
Sheree Dodd from the Foreign and Commonwealth Office.

Phonecall from Cherie Blair, and one from Foreign Secretary Margaret Beckett.

The above are just the advance troops although Sheree Dodd soon returned to London amid reports that she did not accept the McCanns’claim that Madeleine had been abducted.

In any case, experts in various fields who would not normally have been involved in such a case and certainly not that early in the proceedings. Consular assistance is normal, Mark Warner getting their PR expert in is understandable, but only if he was working to promote Mark Warner and not the McCanns. For why would the victims of a crime need PR?

A trauma unit is par for the course these days so that is not out of the ordinary.

So right from the start we have two Foreign Office officials working for the McCanns, these people do not act on their own, they are instructed by the Foreign Office. Who do not in general send out the troops in such numbers without being told to do so - and such commands come from 'above' so to speak.

THE JOURNEY BEGINS:

20^th May: Gerry returns to the UK , he appears not to have seen any family, gets photographed in Rothley amongst yellow ribbons.

22^nd May: Gerry returns with Clarence Mitchell – lent to him by the F.O.

24^th May Last photo released to the world’s Press.

24^th May – the day Missing People launched  with ‘A New Yellow Ribbon  Symbol ‘ a large scale projection on Marble Arch.

24^th May – The McCanns  make a pilgrimage to Fatima. The  DT reports:  ‘The McCanns are launching a series of trips across Europe to help widen the search [..] the couple, both devout Catholics, started their ‘mission’yesterday in Fatima. ‘

Recap:

Missing Persons – changed to Missing People on May 24^th. The event is alleged to have been instigated at the behest of the European Commission, spearheaded by former EC Vice-President and self-appointed ‘Guardian Angel of Children’, Franco Frattini. The event was attended by John McCann. 

Franco Frattini wanted Blair for European Council President  as he  repeated in a speech some two years later. http://archivio.siciliainformazioni.com/now-italy/italy-backs-blair-for-eu-president-frattini-says-he-has-the-stature-and-charisma-for-the-job/

Although Gerry returned to Rothley to ‘trawl through four years of family albums' – to select new pictures of her he comes back with a picture allegedly taken on the day she disappeared – the pool picture.

He also comes back with  the head of the Media Monitoring Unit, who controls what comes out in the news – a job description given to us by the man himself: Clarence Mitchell.

One may conclude: Foreign Office and possibly soon to be ex-PM Blair seem somewhat involved, so too is the European Commission who are promoting Missing People and their yellow ribbons.

There is a strong connection to the yellow ribbons in Rothley two days earlier in my opinion. The usual public response is an avalanche of teddy bears,  dolls, flowers and messages. Not yellow ribbons. So how did the good people of Rothley have such an uncanny feel for what was to come? 

We don’t know where Gerry was, apart from Rothley, during that trip. However, he found Clarence and came back with the news that they would start a European ‘mission’. 

ROME:

Clarence  started at the top: God’s  representative on earth.
Kate’s Diary: 27^th May:  Clarence spoke to us about a possible visit to the Vatican. Rome is already preparing itself.’
Cardinal Cormac Murphy-Oçonnor, the RC Archbishop of Westminster, had been instrumental in organising the visit. (this suggests government connection)

SKY reports that  the Pope has been kept up to date on the search for the 4 yr old.(note: not the Pope who has expressed an interest but the already emerging top level which the McCanns at that time occupied.)

29^th May: The McCanns leave in Sir Philip Green’s private jet for Rome.

30^th – audience with the Pope

30^th – asked a question by a Swedish journalist he is told by Gerry: ‘We have no immediate plans to go to Sweden and we hope and pray that this will be over before we get to Scandinavia.’
(for two people who want the widest possible awareness it seems that Scandinavia wasn't on the list - this may be because the itinerary was not planned by the McCanns but e.g. the Foreign Office?)

 MADRID:

1^ST June – McCanns have a busy day in Madrid taken up with government- and non-government agencies [..] various TV interviews and a press conference.

It is at this point that the intention of becoming a representative of far more than one child is apparent:

Steven Kingstone:  (voice over) ‘here they appealed for help from the public and action from the Spanish authorities.’

Gerry McCann: I would like some reassurance, in Spain, that there has been some proactive, errm investigation regarding Madeleine’s disappearance and I think it is at least worth exploring the possibility that Madeleine’s disappearance should not be considered in isolation.’

Steve Kingstone: As the couple see it, that means cross-referencing this inquiry with other missing children cases throughout Spain and Portugal. [..] This afternoon the McCanns met Spain’s interior minister to discuss a broader approach to child abduction.

Gerry knows the political jargon by now but not where he stands in the pecking order - it is not his place to demand reassurance from the Spanish government that they are investigating this case 'properly'. Demanding proactive investigation is a bit rich coming from that source I feel..

BERLIN AND AMSTERDAM:

The McCanns flew into Berlin  in a private Hawker jet, lent to them by the owner.

They met British ambassador Sir Peter Torry and the Mayor of Berlin Klaus Wowereit.

This didn’t go so well:

Gerry’’s Blog: 6^th June 2007:

[..] There has also been a little bit of criticism in the German press about the amount of media coverage [..] I was still surprised by the question as to whether Kate and I may be involved in Madeleine’s abduction!

[..] We had to delay our flight to Amsterdam because of some information received by the police [..] it turned out to be nothing of interest. Unquote

(A man had phoned the PJ saying he was the abductor but he would only speak to the parents themselves. Nothing of interest then.)

The BBC reports on the 6^th June that: 'the parents  of Madeleine McCann have said their trip around Europe to raise awareness of their missing daughter is their way of taking positive action.'  Unquote

Once in Amsterdam there were no government ministers to meet, no presidents of charities or any such dignitaries. Not even the Mayor of Amsterdam. Just journalists, who didn’t ask the right questions.  So more or less 0 points for that visit. Although after the scheduled meetings Gerry caught up with  “a friend of mine who was attending a medical conference in Amsterdam”. (This was most probably Matthew Oldfield  - interesting since they barely knew each other before the PdL holiday – but perhaps useful.)

MOROCCO: 

Surprisingly, no jet for Morocco, but an ancient pre-war plane. (One wonders if the luxury part of the European Tour had already been down-scaled rather than that the luxury jet had  engine trouble.)

They arrive with posters printed in Arabic and these same posters are presumably the ones which the Moroccan schoolchildren had  to hold up for the photographs.

The Portuguese  journalist Paulo Reis reports:

[..] the English couple was accompanied by a very British gentleman who is presented to us as a British diplomat from the Foreign Office. John Kayne accompanies the English couple on his journey for two weeks.

The McCanns meet with the Directors of various children’s charities and Kate tells us that ‘for these meetings to take place permission must have been granted by the King himself’. A little later she mentions a ‘palace-sponsored child welfare watchdog’.  Still – that’s as close as they got to the King. As an extra they are received by the minister of Islamic Affairs, this meeting is arranged by his daughter, who is their translator.

If we look at the overall results it all started very well in Rome, in Madrid other children were added to the mission but both Berlin and Amsterdam were rather disappointing. There was no mention of the British Ambassador in Amsterdam and there are few details of the meeting with the Mayor of Berlin.

In both cases the press conferences proved to be a minefield. Neither of the McCanns came over well and in Amsterdam advice was given to Gerry by Clarence whilst holding up a pair of pyjamas to hide their conversation. Journalists tend to notice such things.

Morocco too, seems even more of a disappointment. Virtually nothing in the way of government officials, the usual news conference where this time they are flanked by a translator and Clarence.

More to the point – we are told that an official from the Foreign Office has accompanied the McCanns for two weeks. That’s just about right, starting with Rome on the 29^th of May to the 12^th of June. So that means the F.O. had their minder in place.

BUT:

‘madeleine’Chapter 11:

At the beginning of June, Gerry had a call from the director of communications at the Foreign Office… [..] whatever the case, it was suggested to Gerry that we should use Madeleine’s Fund to employ someone to replace Clarence once our campaign visits were complete. Unquote

So from the above we see: government participation and no doubt at all, connections made so that the McCanns could meet dignitaries and preferably government officials. After the Pope's blessing the expectations may have been high, but in fact it went downhill from there fairly fast, resulting in the Foreign Office recalling Clarence and presumably all other liaison with foreign powers to arrange visits for the McCanns ceased at that time.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

It seems that by the middle of June things started to go quiet:

17^th June: Kate’s Diary:

'Cherie Blair phoned to find out how we were.[..] I also had the chance to speak to Tony who told me that we weren’t to hesitate to ask him if there was something he could do to help.’

19^th June Gerry is in the UK,  loses his wallet with the credit cards the Home Office have assured the PJ he doesn’t have, visits (according to Clarence Mitchell) the F.O.  and returns to PdL only to find a drunk in the road who needs help.

There are no photographs from this entire trip, so no journalists lying in wait in Gatwick or elsewhere. It does not appear that he has taken up Blair’s kind offer of help given just two days earlier.  

12^th July – 14^th July -Things are looking a bit better on the next trip when Gerry is honoured by the Police Federation but this junket is arranged entirely by The Sun, who sponsors the award. The Sun even suggests giving the McCanns an award (for what I am not clear) but Kate writes in her book that they didn’t feel worthy of such honours.

Gerry visits CEOP – but that is not a government institution as such – it was at the time a Ltd. Co. with government funding. 

Gerry does meet with the Press Complaints Commission’s president. He visits Sir Christopher Meyer at his home in London where Sir Christopher gives him the bad news that the PCC doesn’t do money for bad publicity.

Somewhere along the line the McCanns have paid Bell Pottinger half a million pounds to keep Madeleine on the front page for a year. Possibly during this period when the media were losing interest.

22^nd July – 26^th July  Gerry is in the US. But once again, not meeting top people, but congressmen and an Attorney-General. He seems to have spent nearly two days at the  US missing children centre. 

Gerry’s blog 25^th July:

[..] visit to the White House to meet with the First Lady’s deputy Chief of Staff Sarah Armstrong. This visit was facilitated by Lady Catherine Meyer, founder of the British charity PACT.  Unquote

Again some name-dropping (Pope and G 8 summit had already had a pat on the back) cunningly  phrased but in effect he met the deputy of the Chief of Staff  of the wife of the President and had a lightning tour of the public areas of the White House.

Gerry managed to  mention the G8 summit in a TV interview and gives the impression they had taken note of the plight of the McCanns. He mentions a discussion with the Attorney General to advance legislation, but it that's all.  He basically only spoke to the president of ICMEC  and a few notables and he got into the White House because an ex-ambassador’s wife pulled a few strings.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This set of journeys together does give some indication where the government definitely did interfere (e.g. Home Office, credit cards, records) and helped (F.O. supplying a minder for the Eurotour, lending Clarrie, making connections with dignitaries to be visited) but on the whole they weren’t wholeheartedly behind the McCanns and their help was withdrawn at the earliest opportunity. That is help in promoting the McCanns, - under Brown the manipulation went on, but by that time it was more   of  a damage limitation exercise. Most of Brown's interference occurred after they became arguidos.

It seems  obvious is that  the press were  losing interest by mid June  and at the same time  the Foreign Office had suggested that if the McCanns wanted media liaison they could pay for it themselves.

The charities stand out in this collection of  players, principally Missing People  – the yellow ribbons in Rothley, the relaunch on the same date that the McCanns announced their European Tour.

Which may well have been arranged with the F.O.  during that visit which also produced the pool photo. 

Blair was about to step down as PM and desperately keen to become European President. That may have been one factor in the unprecedented help given. Cherie Blair was a director of  PACT, a charity which paid the directors more than the total income at one time but had always had European ambitions as evidenced by her interference regarding the Human Rights Act. 

EU wanted  to set up  a complete DNA database of all EU citizens, still does as far as I know.  An abducted photogenic toddler might have been just the catalyst the politicians needed.  

But only by early June was political help being withdrawn, so it took a month for the doubts about the abduction  to reach those with the power to take decisions  - still Blair.  Brown didn't take over until the end of June.  Perhaps Whitehall  finally understood the importance of those shutters or perhaps they'd finally looked at the very files they refused to send to the Police Judiciare: MBM's health records and  the  McCann's credit card records.

And by  September Gordon Brown was not so easily brought into line -  gone were the days when Gerry would phone Brown and leave a message to phone him back asap.   From then on it seems he doesn't even want to speak to them, the glory days didn't last long. 

From the Vanity Fair Interview, September 2007 published in February issue 2008:

........ they now feel deserted by the Prime Minister.

In the interview, Clarence Mitchell, the McCann’s spokesman, said: “...it is true that we have requested a meeting with the prime minister to show him the strength of our case, to explain Kate and Gerry’s innocence - and yet all we’ve been offered is a medium-level-consular meeting, which we rejected.”

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This link is well worth a read:

http://www.mccannfiles.com/id260.html

'MAD COW' LEGISLATION'  02 November 2009

By Dr Martin Roberts

Finding of Fact

•  14. FCO told the Commissioner that a family member had made clear to FCO staff that all comments made by that individual to FCO had been made in strict confidence and were not intended for disclosure to third parties. FCO did not approach the family member again during the Commissioner's investigation but told the Commissioner that they were confident the individual would not appreciate being contacted regarding disclosure of the relevant personal information, a position the Commissioner accepted.

unquote